In-Depth Assessment of Endoscopic Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated by Anti-TNF or Vedolizumab.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Confocal endomicroscopy is a technique allowing the in vivo assessment of the superficial layers of the mucosa. Preliminary studies have already suggested its added value in the assessment of endoscopic remission in inflammatory bowel disease. However, most of these studies were performed on patients still having incomplete mucosal healing. Our aim was to disclose persisting endomicroscopic anomalies in patients with full endoscopic remission and to compare them between vedolizumab- and anti-tumor necrosis factor-treated patients. METHODS: We screened patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) treated for more than 6 months with biologic therapy, and being in steroid-free clinical and biological remission. White light endoscopy and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) analysis were performed in the ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. Full endoscopic remission was defined by a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 in UC and no remaining ulcer or erosion in CD. Patients were prospectively followed up and clinical relapses were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-two CD and UC patients treated by biologic therapy and in clinical and biological remission were screened. A total of 37 were also in full endoscopic remission and were included in our study; 183 intestinal segments were analyzed. We found residual pCLE anomalies in most of the patients. These anomalies were not significantly associated with any demographic or clinical characteristic including the treatment received, nor were they associated with histological parameters, levels of C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin. Among the 37 patients, 7 (18.9%) relapsed over a median follow-up of 33.7 months. The risk of relapse was not associated with any clinical, biological, histologic, or pCLE feature at baseline. CONCLUSION: Despite endoscopic, biological, and even histological remission, we found a high prevalence of endomicroscopic abnormalities, which were not different between anti-tumor necrosis factor- and vedolizumab-treated patients. The clinical significance of these anomalies remains to be clarified.

We studied the abnormalities found by confocal endomicroscopy in patients with chronic inflammatory disease in deep endoscopic remission under immunosuppressive treatment. Relapse was not associated with the abnormalities found, which, although numerous, remain of unknown significance.

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for TNF inhibitor therapy in rheumatic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of TDM-guided TNFi therapy in patients with rheumatic disease was still controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore if the TDM-guided TNFi therapy is superior to empirical-guided therapy. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases for articles published between database inception and October 05, 2023. Studies reporting endpoints in TDM-guided TNFi therapy and empirical therapy were included. Results would be presented in risk ratio (RR) and mean difference, with 95 % confidence interval (CI) reported. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022353956). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (eight RCTs and six cohort studies) involving 2427 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In the scenario of response prediction, compared with empirical-guided therapy, TDM-guided TNFi therapy had association with higher treat-to-target rates (RR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.02-1.65, P=0.03, I2=79 %), more specifically, higher low disease activity rates (RR 2.11, 95 % CI 1.22-3.66, P=0.007, I2=61 %), but no difference in clinical remission rates (RR 0.98,95 % CI 0.87-1.11, P=0.75, I2=0 %). In the scenario of dose reduction prediction, lower relapse rates (RR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.65-0.82, P <0.00001, I2=0 %) were observed compared with empirical-guided dose reduction strategy, but no difference (RR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.85-1.80, P=0.27, I2=57 %) between TDM-guided dose reduction and standard-dosing therapy. No significant difference was observed in change of disease activity score, mean disease activity score, radiographic progression, and safety. And TDM-guided therapy was associated with reduced cost per patient per year calculated as the total accumulated sum of therapy cost. CONCLUSION: TDM-guided TNFi therapy was associated with increased rates of low disease activity and decreased risks of relapse, and may save cost compared with empirical-guided therapy in patients with rheumatic disease. But this does not mean that the use of TDM-guided TNFi therapy can be advocated, because there is no difference in clinical remission rates and many other outcomes. More researches, especially randomized clinical trials are needed to verify this conclusion in the future.

Non-Invasive Assessment of Skin Surface Proteins of Psoriasis Vulgaris Patients in Response to Biological Therapy.

Measurements of skin surface biomarkers have enormous value for the detailed assessment of skin conditions, both for clinical application and in skin care. The main goals of the current study were to assess whether expression patterns of skin surface hBD-1, hBD-2, IL-1α, CXCL-1, and CXCL-8, examples of proteins known to be involved in psoriasis pathology, are associated with disease severity and whether expression patterns of these proteins on the skin surface can be used to measure pharmacodynamic effects of biological therapy. In this observational study using transdermal analysis patch (TAP), levels of skin surface IL-1α, hBD-1, hBD-2, CXCL-1/2, and CXCL-8 of psoriasis vulgaris (PV) patients over biological therapy were assessed. The Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and local score for erythema, induration, and desquamation were determined from the exact same skin area as FibroTx TAP measurements. Thirty-seven adult PV patients were included, of which twenty-three were subjected to anti-TNF-α, seven to anti-IL-17A, and seven to anti-IL12/IL-23 therapy. Significantly higher levels of hBD-1, hBD-2, CXCL-1/2, and CXCL-8 were detected on lesional skin compared to the non-lesional skin of the PV patients. In contrast, lower levels of IL-1α were found in lesional skin compared to non-lesional skin. In addition, we observed that the biomarker expression levels correlate with disease severity. Further, we confirmed that changes in the expression levels of skin surface biomarkers during biological therapy correlate with treatment response. Biomarker expression patterns in response to treatment differed somewhat between treatment subtypes. We observed that, in the case of anti-TNF-α therapy, an increase after a steady decrease in the expression levels of CXCL-1/2 and CXCL-8 occurred before the change in clinical scores. Moreover, response kinetics of skin surface proteins differs between the applied therapies-hBD2 expression responds quickly to anti-IL-17A therapy, CXCL-1/2 to anti-IL-12/23, and levels of CXCL-8 are rapidly down-regulated by IL-17A and IL-12/23 therapy. Our findings confirm that the skin surface hBD-2, IL-1α, CXCL-1/2, and CXCL-8 are markers for the psoriasis severity. Further, data obtained during this study give the basis for the conclusion that skin surface proteins CXCL-1/2 and CXCL-8 may have value as therapeutic biomarkers, thus confirming that measuring the 'molecular root' of inflammation appears to have value in scoring disease severity on its own.

Comparison of a second TNFi vs other biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD following an initial TNFi.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis may require treatment with a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). Often, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is the initial b/tsDMARD. The TNFi may not be effective or may not be well tolerated, so patients will opt for a different TNFi or switch to a non-TNFi b/tsDMARD. No preference for a TNFi or non-TNFi has been established and guidelines are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness by comparing patients using a second TNFi vs a non-TNFi after initial use of TNFi based on treatment patterns and health care utilization. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used Medicare Advantage prescription drug (MAPD) plan, Medicaid, and commercial plan claims data from Humana's Research Database (Louisville, KY). The first claim for TNFi or non-TNFi (July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018) following earlier TNFi was the index date. Patients were required to have pre-index enrollment of 6 months and 12 months post-index along with diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or psoriasis. During the 12-month follow-up, persistence to the index TNFi or non-TNFi was measured as continued therapy without a gap exceeding 45 days (81 days for intravenous infusions). Adherence was proportion of days covered at least 0.8. Addition of a nonbiologic DMARD or corticosteroid was also identified. Inpatient admissions and emergency department visits were observed. Inverse probability of treatment weights was used to balance cohorts. Logistic regression models were fit to TNFi vs non-TNFI on treatment and utilization measures. RESULTS: Of identified patients, 1,022 were indexed to a second TNFi and 1,024 were indexed to non-TNFi. Weighted cohorts were balanced, with mean age 56.5 vs 56.4 years, 70.5% vs 70.7% female sex, and 68.0% vs 67.9% MAPD plan. No differences were observed on persistence or adherence, with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 1.05 (95% CI = 0.91-1.20) and 1.04 (0.91-1.20), respectively. No differences were observed for changes in therapy via switching to another TNFi/non-TNFi (OR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.54-1.62), via nonbiologic DMARD addition (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.83-1.11), or corticosteroid addition (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.92-1.88). No differences were observed for hospitalization (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.99-1.37) or emergency department visits (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.89-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found between a second TNFi vs a non-TNFi. As a result, choice of TNFi or non-TNFi following an initial TNFi may be driven by relevant patient-specific considerations. At the population level, policies that prefer either TNFi or non-TNFi appear reasonable. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by Humana Inc. Mr Racsa is an employee of Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., a subsidiary of Humana Inc. Drs Asante and Bloomfield are employees of Humana Inc. Dr Schwab was an employee of Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., a subsidiary of Humana Inc., and is now an employee of RTI Health Solutions. Dr Cornett was an employee of Humana Inc. and is now an employee of ImmunoGen Inc.

Identifying Predictors of First-Line Subcutaneous TNF-Inhibitor Persistence in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Decision Tree Analysis by Indication.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment persistence is a proxy for efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction, and a switch in treatment or treatment discontinuation has been associated with increased indirect and direct costs in inflammatory arthritis (IA). Hence, there are both clinical and economic incentives for the identification of factors associated with treatment persistence. Until now, studies have mainly leveraged traditional regression analysis, but it has been suggested that novel approaches, such as statistical learning techniques, may improve our understanding of factors related to treatment persistence. Therefore, we set up a study using nationwide Swedish high-coverage administrative register data with the objective to identify patient groups with distinct persistence of subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (SC-TNFi) treatment in IA, using recursive partitioning, a statistical learning algorithm. METHODS: IA was defined as a diagnosis of rheumatic arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis/unspecified spondyloarthritis (AS/uSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Adult swedish biologic-naïve patients with IA initiating biologic treatment with a SC-TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab or golimumab) between May 6, 2010, and December 31, 2017. Treatment persistence of SC-TNFi was derived based on prescription data and a defined standard daily dose. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, number of health care contacts, comorbidities and treatment, were collected at treatment initiation and 12 months before treatment initiation. Based on these characteristics, we used recursive partitioning in a conditional inference framework to identify patient groups with distinct SC-TNFi treatment persistence by IA diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 13,913 patients were included. Approximately 50% had RA, while 27% and 23% had AS/uSpA and PsA, respectively. The recursive partitioning algorithm identified sex and treatment as factors associated with SC-TNFi treatment persistence in PsA and AS/uSpA. Time on treatment in the groups with the lowest treatment persistence was similar across all three indications (9.5-11.3 months), whereas there was more variation in time on treatment across the groups with the highest treatment persistence (18.4-48.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: Women have low SC-TNFi treatment persistence in PsA and AS/uSpA whereas male sex and golimumab are associated with high treatment persistence in these indications. The factors associated with treatment persistence in RA were less distinct but may comprise disease activity and concurrent conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment.

Treatment strategy changes for inflammatory bowel diseases in biologic era: results from a multicenter cohort in Japan, Far East 1000.

Many molecular targeted agents, including biologics, have emerged for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), but their high prices have prevented their widespread use. This study aimed to reveal the changes in patient characteristics and the therapeutic strategies of IBD before and after the implementation of biologics in Japan, where the unique health insurance system allows patients with IBD and physicians to select drugs with minimum patient expenses. The analysis was performed using a prospective cohort, including IBD expert and nonexpert hospitals in Japan. In this study, patients were classified into two groups according to the year of diagnosis based on infliximab implementation as the prebiologic and biologic era groups. The characteristics of therapeutic strategies in both groups were evaluated using association analysis. This study analyzed 542 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 186 Crohn's disease (CD). The biologic era included 53.3% of patients with UC and 76.2% with CD, respectively. The age of UC (33.9 years vs. 38.8 years, P < 0.001) or CD diagnosis (24.3 years vs. 31.9 years, P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the biologic era group. The association analysis of patients with multiple drug usage histories revealed that patients in the prebiologic era group selected anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents, whereas those in the biologic era group preferred biologic agents with different mechanisms other than anti-TNF-α. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that both patient characteristics and treatment preferences in IBD have changed before and after biologic implementation.

An Assessment of Comparative Medication Durability in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients With and Without Co-morbid Psoriasis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and/or Enteropathic Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for many co-morbid diseases. However, little is known about durability of IBD medications in patients with co-morbid diseases. AIMS: Determine medication durability in IBD patients with and without psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and/or enteropathic arthropathy. METHODS: All patients with at least three ICD-9 or 10 diagnoses for IBD were included in the cohort. The risk factors of interest were a co-morbid diagnosis of psoriasis (IBD-Ps), rheumatoid arthritis (IBD-RA), and/or enteropathic arthritis (IBD-EA). Medication durability was defined as days of medication use, calculated using order start and stop dates from the electronic medical record. Significant differences were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test, as appropriate, for categorical variables. Boxplots were constructed for graphical interpretation of results. RESULTS: In the psoriasis group, there were 481 patients with 831 medication exposures [131 IBS-Ps (16%), 700 IBD only (84%)]. The median days of medication use were numerically higher in the IBD-Ps group for all therapies [anti-TNF: 1109 vs 861 (p = 0.17); anti-IL-12/23: 984 vs 834 (p = 0.33); JAKi: 682 vs 230 (p = 0.13)], anti-TNF/IM: 370 vs 202 (p = 0.57), except anti-integrin therapy [214 vs 470 (p = 0.08)]. When restricting to UC only, patients with co-morbid again Ps had a significantly shorter duration on anti-integrin therapy (84 vs 456 days, p = 0.02). While not reaching statistical significance, there was a distinctly longer medication duration on JAKi therapy (910 vs 317, p = 0.10). When restricting to patients with CD only, no results reached statistical significance though there was a trend towards longer anti-TNF durability in CD-Ps (1340 vs 1000 days, p = 0.098). There were no differences in medication durability in IBD-RA or IBD-EA patients. DISCUSSION: Larger studies investigating medication durability of JAKi and anti-integrin therapy in IBD patients with psoriasis would be beneficial given noteworthy trends towards increased and decreased durability, respectively.

Increasing healthcare costs in inflammatory bowel disease 2007-2020 in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease has been linked to increasing healthcare costs, but longitudinal data on other societal costs are scarce. AIM: To assess costs, including productivity losses, in patients with prevalent Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in Sweden between 2007 and 2020. METHODS: We linked data from national registers on all patients with CD or UC and a matched (sex, birthyear, healthcare region and education) reference population. We assessed mean costs/year in Euros, inflation-adjusted to 2020, for hospitalisations, out-patient visits, medications, sick leave and disability pension. We defined excess costs as the mean difference between patients and matched comparators. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2020, absolute mean annual societal costs in working-age (18-64 years) individuals decreased by 17% in CD (-24% in the comparators) and by 20% in UC (-27% in comparators), due to decreasing costs from sick leave and disability, a consequence of stricter sick leave regulations. Excess costs in 2007 were dominated by productivity losses. In 2020, excess costs were mostly healthcare costs. Absolute and excess costs increased in paediatric and elderly patients. Overall, costs for TNF inhibitors/targeted therapies increased by 274% in CD and 638% in UC, and the proportion treated increased from 5% to 26% in CD, and from 1% to 10% in UC. CONCLUSION: Between 2007 and 2020, excess costs shifted from productivity losses to direct healthcare costs; that is, the patients' compensation for sickness absence decreased, while society increased its spending on medications. Medication costs were driven both by expanding use of TNF inhibitors and by high costs for newer targeted therapies.

Persistence of second-line biologics in psoriasis after first-line biologic failure: a nationwide cohort study from the French health insurance database (SNDS).

BACKGROUND: Many biologics are available for psoriasis and have been compared in real-life studies based on their persistence (i.e. time between initiation and discontinuation). However, after first-line biologic failure, data are lacking on the choice of second-line biologic among the four available classes [tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi); interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 inhibitor (IL-12/IL-23i); IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i); and IL-23 inhibitors (IL-23i)]. OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term persistence of available second-line biologics in psoriasis according to prior exposure. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to a hospital discharge database. Participants were adults with psoriasis, defined as having at least two prescriptions of a topical vitamin D derivative within a 2-year period, with initiation of a second-line biologic between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. We included patients who initiated a second-line biologic directly after first-line discontinuation (i.e. without a 'washout' period). The end of follow-up was 30 June 2022. Discontinuation was defined as > 90 days without filling a prescription for the same treatment after the period covered by the previous prescription. Comparison of persistence by biologic class involved using propensity score-weighted Cox models (inverse probability treatment weighting) and adjustment of specific systemic nonbiologics (time-dependent variables). RESULTS: We included 8693 patients [mean (SD) age 50 (14) years; 50.5% male]; 2824 (32.5%) started TNFi, 1561 (18.0%) IL-12/IL-23i, 2707 (31.1%) IL-17i and 1601 (18.4%) IL-23i. Overall, 1- and 3-year persistence rates were 60% and 30%, respectively. After weighting and adjustment, persistence was longer with IL-12/IL-23i [weighted hazard ratio (HRw) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.76)], IL-17i (HRw 0.70, 95% CI 0.64-0.78) and IL-23i (HRw 0.36, 95% CI 0.31-0.42) than TNFi, except after first-line IL-17i treatment, with no difference between IL-12/IL-23i, IL-17i and TNFi second-line persistence. Persistence was longer with IL-23i as a second-line treatment than IL-12/IL-23i (HRw 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.63) and IL-17i (HRw 0.51, 95% CI 0.44-0.60), regardless of first-line treatment, with no difference seen between IL-12/IL-23i and IL-17i (HRw 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: This real-life study suggests the longer persistence of IL-23i than TNFi, IL-17i and IL-12/IL-23i as second-line treatment for psoriasis. Persistence rates for all biologics remained low at 3 years.

Budget impact analysis and treatment availability with biosimilar TNF inhibitors in rheumatic diseases in Poland: real-world evidence using a nationwide database.

OBJECTIVES: Although several years have passed since biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were introduced to the market, considerable disparities in access still remain. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have proven to be highly effective and safe for treating patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). The emergence of biosimilars is promising for cost reduction and more equitable, widespread access. METHODS: A retrospective budget impact analysis based on final drug prices was conducted using 12 687 treatment courses for infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. Estimated and real-life savings for public payer were calculated from an 8-year perspective of TNFi use. Data on the treatment cost and on the evolution in the number of patients treated was provided. RESULTS: From a public payer perspective, the estimated total savings amount to over €243 million for TNFi, with over €166 million attributed to treatment cost reduction in RMDs. Real-life savings were calculated as €133 million and €107 million, respectively. The rheumatology sector generated between 68% and 92% of total savings across models, depending on the adopted scenario. The overall decrease in mean annual cost of treatment ranged between 75% and 89% in the study frame. If all budget savings were spent on reimbursement of additional TNFi, a hypothetical total of almost 45 000 patients with RMDs could be treated in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nation-level analysis that shows estimated and real-life direct cost-savings for TNFi biosimilars. Transparent criteria for reinvesting savings should be developed on both a local and an international levels.

[Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy for paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review]. / Antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral (TNF) en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal pediátrica: Una revisión sistemática.

Inflammatory bowel disease includes two chronic inflammatory diseases, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The burden of disease is increasing worldwide. A few reviews evaluating the paediatric use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have been published, although these mostly include observational studies and do not consider economic evaluations. This systematic review evaluated the available evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TNF antagonist therapy for paediatric inflammatory bowel disease. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central (up to May 2022). Nine randomized clinical trials and four economic evaluations that examined any anti-TNF drugs (e.g., infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab) against different alternatives were included. In studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs in Crohn's disease, most assessed the efficacy of maintenance regimen in patients who had previously responded to induction (response=28%-63%, and clinical remission=17%-83% depending on dose, drug, and follow-up). In ulcerative colitis, maintenance treatment with anti-TNF drugs reported clinical remission rates between 17% and 44%. Nine studies reported information on adverse events. No clinical trials comparing different anti-TNF drugs were found. The findings from this review suggest that maintenance treatment with anti-TNF drugs (such as infliximab and adalimumab) in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease is probably effective and safe. However, the economic evaluations reported contradictory results of the cost-effectiveness ratios. Protocol registry: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/wjmvf.

Site-specific assessment of spinal radiographic progression improves detection of TNF blocker-associated disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis: longitudinal observational data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether time-varying treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) has a differential impact on structural damage progression on different spinal segments (cervical versus lumbar spine). METHODS: Patients with r-axSpA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort were included if cervical and lumbar radiographs were available at intervals of 2 years for a maximum of 10 years. Paired radiographs were scored by two calibrated readers according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The relationship between TNFi use and progression in the cervical and the lumbar spine was analysed using generalised estimating equation models and adjustment for potential confounding. Radiographic progression per spinal segment was defined as an increase of ≥ 1 mSASSS unit or by the formation of ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. RESULTS: Mean ± SD symptom duration was 13.8 ± 9.8 years. Mean ± SD mSASSS progression per radiographic interval was 0.41 ± 1.69 units in the cervical spine and 0.45 ± 1.45 units in the lumbar spine (p = 0.66). Prior use of TNFi significantly reduced the odds of progression in the cervical spine by 68% (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.72), but not in the lumbar spine (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.52-1.88). A more restricted inhibition of progression in the lumbar spine was confirmed after multiple imputation of missing covariate data (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.41, for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). It was also confirmed with progression defined as formation of ≥ 1 syndesmophyte (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.80 versus OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.24 for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). CONCLUSION: Disease modification by treatment with TNFi seems to more profoundly affect the cervical spine in this r-axSpA population with longstanding disease. Site-specific analysis of spinal progression might, therefore, improve detection of disease modification in clinical trials in axSpA.

Eficacia y seguridad de guselkumab y secukinumab en pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar severa, no respondedores a terapia tópica y sistémica convencional y no tributario a terapia biológica antagonista al factor de necrosis tumoral por antecedente de neoplasia maligna / Efficacy and safety of guselkumab and secukinumab in adult patients with severe psoriasis vulgaris, non-responsive to conventional topical and systemic therapy and not amenable to biological therapy antagonistic to tumor necrosis factor due to a history of malignancy

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021 y ampliada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 97-IETSI-ESSALUD2022, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el cual expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de guselkumab y secukinumab en pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar severa, no respondedores a terapia tópica y sistémica convencional y no tributario a terapia biológica antagonista al factor de necrosis tumoral disponible en EsSalud por antecedente de neoplasia maligna, en comparación de la mejor terapia de soporte. Así, la médica Evelyn Giuliana Castro Vargas, especialista en dermatología, a través del Comité Farmacoterapéutico del Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren y siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016, envía al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación - IETSI la solicitud de autorización de uso del producto farmacéutico guselkumab no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud. ASPECTOS GENERALES La psoriasis es una enfermedad dermatológica inflamatoria crónica no transmisible que afecta aproximadamente del 1 % al 3 % de la población mundial (Augustin et al., 2010) con una prevalencia de alrededor del 2.5 % en el Perú (Rodríguez-Zúñiga, 2016). Esta enfermedad es considerada como un problema de salud pública y de elevada carga para la sociedad (Parisi et al., 2013), lo que se explica por su alto riesgo de morbilidad y porque deteriora la calidad de vida y la salud mental de las personas que lo padecen (Boehnoke & Schón, 2015). El fenotipo de psoriasis más común es la psoriasis vulgar, que se caracteriza por la presencia de placas eritematosas, gruesas y escamosas que se presentan mayormente en cuero cabelludo, glúteos, tronco y extremidades (codos y rodillas). La psoriasis suele clasificarse en leve, moderada y severa, según la clinimetría de las mediciones del Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), la Body surface area (BSA) y la calidad de vida medida a partir del Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (Finlay, 2015; Robinson et al., 2012). Es decir, la enfermedad severa se define por tener más de 10 puntos en el PASI, más del 10 % de la superficie corporal (BSA) afectada por la enfermedad, o más de 10 puntos en el DLQI (Strober et al., 2019). Los tratamientos para los pacientes con psoriasis vulgar severa tienen como objetivo lograr una reducción de por lo menos el 75 % o 90 % de la severidad de enfermedad inicial medida por la escala PASI (i.e. PASI75 o PASI90, respectivamente) luego de al menos tres meses de tratamiento efectivo (Belinchón Romero et al., 2021). Asimismo, se considera que, si después de 16 a 24 semanas de la aplicación de un esquema terapéutico efectivo no se ha logrado por lo menos alcanzar el PASI75 con DLQI < 5 o un PASI90, se considera que el paciente no ha respondido al tratamiento (i.e. falla terapéutica) (Aschoff et al., 2021). Así, entre los tratamientos disponibles para la psoriasis tenemos la terapia tópica que se utiliza en los casos de psoriasis leve a moderada', y la terapia sistémica, en casos de psoriasis de moderada a severa2. Dentro de la terapia sistémica, tenemos a los agentes sistémicos convencionales (metotrexato, ciclosporina o acitretina) y la terapia biológica. Ésta última se utiliza generalmente en los casos de falla al tratamiento con agentes sistémicos convencionales (Gisondi et al., 2017). Las terapias biológicas se clasifican según el mecanismo de acción, es decir, según la inhibición dirigida a citoquinas específicas del sistema inmune, tales como el factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (TNF), la interleucina (IL) 17 (IL17) y la IL23 (Fellner, 2016). METODOLOGIA: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad de guselkumab y secukinumab en pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar severa no respondedores a terapia tópica y sistémica convencional y no tributario a terapia biológica anti TNF disponibles en EsSalud por antecedente de neoplasia maligna. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos bibliográficas de PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science y LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias 'de la Salud). Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de la información generada en las páginas web de grupos o instituciones que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC), tales como: el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ), la Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), la New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), la National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI), el Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), la Haute Authorité de Santé (HAS), el Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), la Comissáo Nacional de lncorporagáo de Tecnologías no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC), el Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) y en la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA). Además, se realizó una búsqueda de las guías en las principales instituciones o sociedades especializadas en dermatología y en psoriasis, tales como la American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), la British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), la European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), y la International Psoriasis Council (IPC). Adicionalmente, se llevó a cabo una búsqueda manual en el motor de búsqueda Google utilizando los términos: "Psoriasis guidelines"; revisando documentos de interés en las diez primeras páginas. Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda adicional en la página web de registro de ensayos clínicos (EC) www.clinicaltrials.gov, para identificar EC en curso o aún no publicados. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica hasta diciembre de 2022, se identificaron: una GPC de la BAD publicada en el 2020 (Smith et al., 2020); y una RS con MA en red (Sbidian et al., 2022) publicada en el 2022 que fue seleccionada como evidencia indirecta para responder a la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen. CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación aprueba el uso de guselkumab en pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar severa, no respondedores a terapia tópica y sistémica convencional y no tributario a terapia biológica anti TNF antecedente de neoplasia maligna, como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud, según lo establecido en el Anexo N° 1. La vigencia del presente informe preliminar es de un año a partir de la fecha de publicación. Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de mayor evidencia que pueda surgir en el tempo.

Treatment patterns and healthcare costs among patients with psoriasis initiating apremilast or biologics: a retrospective claims database cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare treatment patterns and healthcare costs for patients with psoriasis who initiate apremilast, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, or interleukin inhibitor. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart to identify propensity score-matched patients initiating apremilast, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, or interleukin inhibitors, with 12-month baseline and 24-month follow-up data. Switch, discontinuation, persistence, healthcare resource utilization, and total healthcare costs were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four-month switch rates were highest for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (32%), followed by apremilast (21%) then interleukin inhibitors (14%). Mean (SD) per-patient-per-month costs for switchers were lowest for apremilast ($4213 [$2304]), higher for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors ($5274 [$2280]), and highest for interleukin inhibitors ($5539 [$2296]; p < .001), primarily attributable to pharmacy costs: $3466 (apremilast), $4432 (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor), and $4721 (interleukin inhibitor). LIMITATIONS: Psoriasis severity is absent from claims data; cost outcomes may be influenced by more severe psoriasis being more costly. CONCLUSION: Switching psoriasis treatment is common and increases over time. Apremilast initiators had lower switch rates and costs compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, despite lower effectiveness reported in previous studies, perhaps indicating patient preference for oral treatment. Additional oral options may be desirable for this population.

Insurance Status and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Initiation Among Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in the CARRA Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Prompt escalation to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) is recommended for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and ongoing disease activity despite treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). It is unknown whether these recommendations are equitably followed for children with different insurance types. We assessed the association of insurance coverage on the odds and timing of TNFi use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children with newly diagnosed JIA in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. We compared the odds of starting a TNFi in the first year and time from cDMARD to TNFi initiation between those with public and private insurance. RESULTS: We identified 1086 children with new JIA diagnoses. Publicly insured children had significantly higher active joint counts and parent/patient global assessment scores at the enrollment visit. They were also more likely to have polyarticular arthritis compared to those with private insurance. Odds of any TNFi use in the first year did not differ between publicly and privately insured children. Publicly insured children were escalated from cDMARD to TNFi more quickly than privately insured children. CONCLUSION: Children who were publicly insured had more severe disease and polyarticular involvement at registry enrollment compared to those who were privately insured. Whereas overall TNFi use did not differ between children with different insurance types, publicly insured children were escalated more quickly, consistent with their increased disease severity. Further research is needed to determine why insurance coverage type is associated with disease severity, including how other socioeconomic factors affect presentation to care.

Discontinuation of biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis from multicenter cohort study.

Despite of the availability of several effective bDMARDs, a significant proportion of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients discontinued bDMARDs. The aims of this study were to analyze causes of bDMARDs discontinuation in RA and AS included in the Moroccan registry RBSMR. A historical prospective multicenter cohort study based on the RBSMR database at 12 months of follow-up, which included 225 RA and 170 AS. Using T student, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared or Fischer exact tests, baseline demographic and clinical features were compared between patients discontinuing bDMARDs and patients remaining on initiated bDMARDs or switching bDMARDs. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with drugs discontinuation. 61 RA discontinued bDMARDs and 47 AS interrupted anti-TNF. The most common reasons for drugs discontinuation were adverse events (7.5%) in RA patients and social security reimbursement problems (16.8%) in AS. RA patients discontinuing bDMARDs were more frequently first-line biological drugs users, more frequently female and had more comorbidities and lower DAS28 CRP than RA patients remaining on initiated bDMARDs or switching bDMARDs (p < 0.001, p = 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Female sex and comorbidities were the significant predictors of bDMARDs discontinuation in RA patients. Higher baseline BASDAI had a protective role on anti-TNF interruption in AS patients. Adverse events and social security reimbursement problems were the main reasons for drugs discontinuation in RA and AS patients respectively. Female sex and comorbidities in RA patients, baseline BASDAI in AS patients impacted bDMARDs discontinuation in real-life settings.

[Assessment of pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment].

BACKGROUND: To assess pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment. METHODS: Observational retrospective study of patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment who visited the health care center as outpatients in February/August 2020. We collected demographic (sex and age), clinical (diagnosis, pain presence, intensity, and location), and pharmacological (biological therapy, concomitant treatment with traditional DMARDs, and analgesic treatment) variables from the electronic medical records and Farmatools Dominion®. RESULTS: We included 138 patients; mean age was 56 years and 71% were female. The most frequent diagnosis (47%) was ankylosing spondylitis. Anti-TNF-a was the most prescribed biological drug (64%); 60.1% of study patients received traditional drugs, particularly methotrexate and leflunomide (51.8 and 28.9%, respectively). Pain was reported in 81% of the cases, particularly in hands (73.2%) and knees (69.6%); mean pain intensity was 6.5 (VAS). Although 83.3% of the patients had been prescribed analgesics, pain persisted in 84.8% of the cases (VAS >4), being severe or very severe in 67.9%. Over half of the patients (52.2%) used more than one analgesic. The most frequently prescribed medications were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (60%), paracetamol (52.2%), and opioids (56.5%). NSAIDs controlled pain (14.5%) better than opioids (8.3%); there was no post-treatment improvement of pain in 29.6% of the patients. The number of prescribed drugs increased with pain intensity (rho= 0.264; p= 0.006). CONCLUSION: Almost 70% of study patients had uncontrolled severe rheumatic-related pain. This implies a challenge for esta­blishing effective treatments for this type of pain.

Cost-consequence of abatacept as first-line therapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients using IORRA real-world data.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) as first-line (1L) therapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis database. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used to estimate the cost per American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% improvement (ACR50) responder and per patient in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission from a Japanese healthcare payers' perspective over a 2-year time horizon. Clinical characteristics of patients on ABA-1L were matched with those of patients on ABA second or later line (2L+) or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-1L directly or using propensity scores. Resource utilisation and medical costs were calculated from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database. Parameter uncertainty was addressed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses (age, treatment duration, Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire [J-HAQ] score). RESULTS: Incremental costs per member per month (ΔPMPM) for ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L and ABA-2L+ were -1,571 Japanese Yen (JPY) and 81 JPY, respectively. For ABA-1L versus TNFi-1L, ΔPMPM by ACR50 response was -11,715 JPY and by CDAI and SDAI remission 11,602 JPY and 47,003 JPY, respectively. Corresponding costs for ABA-1L were lower for all outcome parameters versus those for ABA-2L+. Scenario analyses showed that ABA-1L was cost-effective over TNFi-1L in patients <65 years for any outcome. Furthermore, ABA-1L was cost-effective over ABA-2L+ for all outcomes in patients with age <65 years, disease duration <5 years and J-HAQ ≥1.5. CONCLUSIONS: ABA-1L demonstrated a favourable cost-effectiveness profile in RA patients, accruing savings for the Japanese healthcare payers.